help: association failure
Jim Gettys
jg at laptop.org
Fri Dec 1 10:46:34 EST 2006
FWIW: I believe I was also having association failures with my Linksys
WRT54GL's at home (the WRT54's are very common).
I'll verify tonight when I can take a machine home again.
Regards,
- Jim
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 10:40 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 21:27 -0800, Javier Cardona wrote:
> > Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > We'll try to reproduce this in the office tomorrow. But before we try
> > that, can you tell us what version of FW and driver are you running?
> > Could you provide the output of ethtool -i ethX?
>
> I've also gotten an assoc failure code of '2' at various times. We're
> using pretty old Orinoco-based APs here at the OLPC office, not sure if
> that has anything to do with it.
>
> Dan
>
> > The status codes that you see are indeed strange. Typically 802.11
> > standards use the word 'Reserved' for values that may be defined in
> > future versions of the standard. I could not find any 802.11
> > ammendment that defines those values, so in principle they should not
> > be used (vendor specific ranges are usually specified as such).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Javier
> >
> >
> > On 11/30/06, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo at kvack.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm running into a problem with test-A board association and clues are welcome.
> > >
> > > Note that association with the exact same test-A board and this very same
> > > Linksys AP used to work in the past. There were no significant changes
> > > in the AP as far as I can tell.
> > >
> > > Also note that an ipw2200 driven ThinkPad and an iMac associate normally
> > > to said AP.
> > >
> > > -bash-3.1# iwlist eth0 scan
> > > eth0 Scan completed :
> > > Cell 01 - Address: 00:0C:41:F5:4D:26
> > > ESSID:"linksys"
> > > Mode:Managed
> > > Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
> > > Quality=46/100 Signal level=-87 dBm Noise level=-96 dBm
> > > Encryption key:off
> > > Bit Rates:48 Mb/s
> > > Cell 02 - Address: 00:0F:3D:66:BE:36
> > > ESSID:"default"
> > > Mode:Managed
> > > Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)
> > > Quality=33/100 Signal level=-92 dBm Noise level=-96 dBm
> > > Encryption key:off
> > > Bit Rates:54 Mb/s
> > > Cell 03 - Address: 00:12:17:00:EA:06
> > > ESSID:"casa"
> > > Mode:Managed
> > > Frequency:2.447 GHz (Channel 8)
> > > Quality=52/100 Signal level=-84 dBm Noise level=-96 dBm
> > > Encryption key:off
> > > Bit Rates:11 Mb/s
> > >
> > > -bash-3.1# iwconfig eth0 essid linksys
> > > -bash-3.1# iwconfig eth0 ap 00:0C:41:F5:4D:26
> > > -bash-3.1# iwconfig eth0
> > > eth0 MRVL-USB8388 ESSID:""
> > > Mode:Managed Frequency:2.437 GHz Access Point: Not-Associated
> > > Bit Rate:1 Mb/s Tx-Power=13 dBm
> > > Retry limit:8 RTS thr=2347 B Fragment thr=2346 B
> > > Encryption key:off
> > > Power Management:off
> > > Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0
> > > Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
> > > Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
> > >
> > > Both essid and AP association fail similarly.
> > >
> > > Looking at the log, we see the association request:
> > >
> > > DNLD_CMD: Sent command 0x50 @ 1
> > > DNLD_CMD: Command: 50 00 3f 00
> > > b9 01 00 00 00 0c 41 f5 4d 26 01 04 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 00 6c 69 6e 6b 73 79
> > > 73 03 00 01 00 06 04 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 0c 00 82 84 8b 96 0c 12 1
> > > 8 24 30 48 60 6c
> > >
> > > and the failed association response:
> > >
> > > CMD_RESP: @ 1289479
> > > CMD_RESP:: 12 80 0e 00 b9 01 00 00 01 04 04 00 05 c0
> > > CMD_RESP: 8012 Result: 0 Length: 14
> > > ASSOC_RESP: Association Failed, status code = 4
> > >
> > > Using another AP (which is from an unknown neighbour), I get:
> > >
> > > Association request:
> > > DNLD_CMD: Sent command 0x50 @ 1
> > > DNLD_CMD: Command: 50 00 34 00
> > > 76 01 00 00 00 12 17 00 ea 06 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 63 61 73 61 03 00
> > > 01 00 08 04 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 04 00 82 84 8b 96
> > >
> > > Association response:
> > > CMD_RESP: @ 1196977
> > > CMD_RESP:: 12 80 0e 00 76 01 00
> > > CMD_RESP: 8012 Result: 0 Length : 14
> > > ASSOC_RESP: Association Failed, status code = 3
> > >
> > > Looking at the IEEE 802.11 standard, association response management frame
> > > status field description:
> > >
> > > 7.3.1.9 Status Code field
> > >
> > > The Status Code field is used in a response management frame to
> > > indicate the success or failure of a requested operation. The length
> > > of the Status Code field is 2 octets. If an operation is successful,
> > > then the status code is set to 0. If an operation results in failure,
> > > the status code indicates a failure cause. The failure cause codes are
> > > defined in Table 19.
> > >
> > > Table 19—Status codes
> > >
> > > Status code Meaning
> > > 0 Successful
> > > 1 Unspecified failure
> > > 2–9 Reserved
> > > 10 Cannot support all requested capabilities in the Capability Information field
> > > 11 Reassociation denied due to inability to confirm that association exists
> > > 12 Association denied due to reason outside the scope of this standard
> > > 13 Responding station does not support the specified authentication algorithm
> > > 14 Received an Authentication frame with authentication transaction sequence number
> > > out of expected sequence
> > > 15 Authentication rejected because of challenge failure
> > > 16 Authentication rejected due to timeout waiting for next frame in sequence
> > > 17 Association denied because AP is unable to handle additional associated stations
> > > 18 Association denied due to requesting station not supporting all of the data rates in the
> > > BSSBasicRateSet parameter
> > > 19–65 535 Reserved
> > >
> > > So the status code response being seen are in the "Reserved" range.
> > >
> > > I suppose that "Reserved" range is manufacturer specific?
> > >
> > > If so, what could be the meaning for status codes 4 in association
> > > response from Linksys WRT54G and status code 3 in reponse from "unknown
> > > vendor at neighbour".
> > >
> > > Some recent driver change could be causing it, should try an older build.
> > >
> > > Useful datapoint is that it used to work before with exact same AP!
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > libertas-dev mailing list
> > > libertas-dev at lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/libertas-dev
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> libertas-dev mailing list
> libertas-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/libertas-dev
--
Jim Gettys
One Laptop Per Child
More information about the libertas-dev
mailing list